Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Clayborn v. Traughber et al
as 3:2009cv00348
Plaintiff:
Glen D. Clayborn
Defendant:
Charles Traughber, James H. Austin, Patsy Bruce and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. Harvard Business Review et al
as 4:2009cv00025
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Harvard Business Review, Henry J. Boye, Alex Clemente and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
James Murphy v. USA
as 09-5257
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES H. MURPHY
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Larson v. United States of America
as 5:2009cv00074
Plaintiff:
James H. Larson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Prater v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2008cv01288
Plaintiff:
James H. Prater
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, George Little, Reuben Hodge and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Noble v. Collins et al
as 2:2008cv00881
Plaintiff:
James H. Noble
Defendant:
Terry Collins, Gary R. Croft, Deb Timmerman-Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
James Murphy v. USA
as 08-6114
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES H. MURPHY
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Larson v. Hardin County Detention Center
as 3:2007cv00611
Petitioner:
James H. Larson
Respondent:
Hardin County Detition Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Myers et al v. TransCor America, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00295
Plaintiff:
Michael Myers, Robert G. Neale, Mark B. Mumley and others
Defendant:
Transcor America, LLC, Bill Brees and John Doe Guards
Movant:
Kim A. Willis, Gene M. Goodrich, James H. Lund and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larson v. Two Women Commonwealth Attorneys et al
as 3:2007cv00610
Plaintiff:
James H. Larson
Defendant:
Two Women Commonwealth Attorneys and Detective Love
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
