Cases 31 - 40 of 344
Mays v. Peters et al
as 2:2023cv02506
Petitioner:
James Mays, III
Defendant:
Collette Peters
Respondent:
F. J. Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bobo v. Bowers et al
as 2:2023cv02498
Petitioner:
Travis D. Bobo
Respondent:
Freddie Bowers, C. Peters, T. D. Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McKinney v. Bowers et al
as 2:2023cv02437
Petitioner:
Charles E. McKinney
Respondent:
F. J. Bowers, C. Peters, T. D. Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Spigner v. Dede et al
as 2:2023cv02221
Plaintiff:
David Spigner
Defendant:
Dede, Peters and Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rines v. Peters et al
as 4:2023cv01335
Plaintiff:
Allison Renee Rines and Anthony Craig Rines
Defendant:
C. Peters, Dr. Alex Mclearen, TEC Jeanna Eplin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Collins
as 3:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
Peter L. Brown
Defendant:
Jerry Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Reynolds v. Peter Watson, et al
as 23-1586
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LEE-LAMAR REYNOLDS
Defendant / Appellee:
PETER WATSON, Nurse practitioner; individually, personal, and official capacities, R. YARN, Medical provider; individually, personal, and official capacities, VICKI SHERBROOK, Registered nurse; individually, personal, and official capacities and others
Cantu v. Bowers et al
as 2:2023cv02376
Petitioner:
Oziel Cantu
Respondent:
F. J. Bowers, C. Peters, T.D. Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Anderson v. Corrigan
as 1:2023cv01190
Plaintiff:
Wilfred L. Anderson
Defendant:
Judge Peter J. Corrigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
