Cases 31 - 40 of 128
Odom v. Nashville Metro Police Dept. et al
as 3:2020cv01008
Defendant:
Nashville Metro Police Dept. and PO Cheng
Plaintiff:
Jason Odom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Lee et al
as 2:2020cv05591
Defendant:
Ryan Lee, Devin Reiser, Columbus Police Dept and others
Plaintiff:
Ashley C Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanier v. Nashville Metro Police Dept. et al
as 3:2020cv00915
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff's Office and Nashville Metro Police Dept.
Plaintiff:
William Lanier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yazid v. Webster et al
as 2:2020cv00097
Defendant:
Jailer Mike Webster, 2 Ky State Policemen, Jackie Bodenhammer and others
Plaintiff:
Hanif Yazid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson et al v. Strickland-Saffold et al
as 1:2020cv01330
Defendant:
Atty. Justin Weatherly, Ofc. John Doe 5, Ofc. John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Robinson, Maiya McCoy and Martin Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yazid v. Webster et al
as 3:2020cv00379
Defendant:
Mike Webster, 2 Ky State Policemen, Jackie Bodenhammer and others
Plaintiff:
Hanif Yazid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. City of Memphis Police Dept. et al
as 2:2019cv02679
Defendant:
Unknown City of Memphis Police Lutenent, City of Memphis Police Dept., Unknown Memphis City Police Officer and others
Plaintiff:
Harry Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2019cv02429
Defendant:
Shelby Co. Health Dept., State of Tennessee, Shelby County Sheriff Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
John E. Jackson, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Savoca v. O'Neill et al
as 1:2019cv00014
Defendant:
Josh Hank, Jack Remally, Gary Arbeswsek and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas James Savoca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Midock et al
as 5:2018cv02686
Defendant:
Stark County Sheriff's Dept., Charles Saler, Bryan McWilliams and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
