Cases 31 - 40 of 772
Christopher Rogers v. USA
as 23-5312
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER GUY ROGERS
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Gray v. Farmer et al
as 5:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jamie Gray
Defendant:
Lisa Farmer, Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government, Scott Colvin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Montgomery v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv00275
Plaintiff:
Gary Montgomery
Defendant:
Philip E. Smith, Lesley Burnett Montgomery, Doug Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Mays et al
as 3:2023cv00231
Plaintiff:
Danny E. Rogers
Defendant:
Tony Mays, Linda Stokes, Michael Jemeyson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Lemaster
as 1:2023cv01026
Petitioner:
Hrondy Tarvus Rogers
Respondent:
Warden David Lemaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Schrimer v. Powell County Detention Center et al
as 5:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Tyler Schrimer and Tyler Schirmer
Defendant:
Powell County Detention Center, Powell County Sheriff Department, George Nester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brad Neubert v. Roger D. Wilson Detention Facility
as 23-5026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRAD A. NEUBERT
Defendant / Appellee:
ROGER D. WILSON DETENTION FACILITY
Christopher Rogers v. Sandra Butler
as 23-5016
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER GUY ROGERS
Respondent / Appellee:
SANDRA BUTLER, Warden
Neubert v. Roger D. Wilson Detention Facility
as 3:2022cv00447
Plaintiff:
Brad A. Neubert
Defendant:
Roger D. Wilson Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry Larson v. LaShann Eppinger, et al
as 22-4029
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRY LARSON
Defendant:
LASHANN EPPINGER
Defendant / Appellee:
KEITH J. FOLEY, JANICE DOUGLAS, ANDREW D. EDDY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
