Cases 41 - 50 of 1,286
Clark v. Patton et al
as 2:2023cv11574
Plaintiff:
Burrell Clark
Defendant:
Renata Patton, Andrea Owens and FNU McCollough
Clark v. Schiebner
as 2:2023cv11546
Petitioner:
Tony Clark
Respondent:
Warden James Schiebner and James Schiebner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Clark v. USA
as 23-5555
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL B. CLARK
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Billie Chapman, et al v. Tony Parker, et al
as 23-5534
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BILLIE JOE CHAPMAN
Plaintiff:
IAN J. CAMERON
Defendant / Appellee:
TONY PARKER, VINCENT VANTELL, Acting Warden, LIEUTENANT JACKSON and others
Smith #233282 v. Dawdy et al
as 1:2023cv00575
Plaintiff:
Christopher Carson Smith #233282
Defendant:
David Dawdy, Heidi Washington, Greg Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Perry, Warden et al
as 3:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
Frederick Turner and Fredrick Tucker
Defendant:
Grady Perry, Warden, TDOC Commissioner, Jordan Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark #585601 v. Kangas et al
as 2:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Fernando Clark #585601
Defendant:
Tyler Kangas, Brian Laitila, Unknown Duquette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mario Clarke v. Michael Burgess
as 23-1459
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARIO JERMAINE CLARKE
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL BURGESS
Ray Heid, et al v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 23-3367
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAY SCOTT HEID and JAMES E. DAMRON
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY C. MOHR, Director, ROGER WILSON, Chief Inspector, TREVOR CLARK, Individually and others
Clarke v. Grayson County Detention Center et al
as 4:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
Terrance Clarke
Defendant:
Grayson County Detention Center, Jason Woosley, Roy Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
