Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 2,139
Hall v. Newton et al
as 2:2024cv00011
Plaintiff: Daniel Richard Hall, III
Defendant: Newton, Caldwell and Kingsport City Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keidrick v. Van Teil et al
as 3:2024cv00082
Plaintiff: Daniel Keidrick
Defendant: Warden Van Teil and Unknown Green Team Members
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Hudgins et al
as 3:2024cv00073
Plaintiff: Kendrick Brown
Defendant: Caleb Hudgins, Steven White, William Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Couch v. Akers
as 3:2024cv00006
Plaintiff: Alastair Couch
Defendant: Daniel Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stephenson v. Phillips, et al.
as 3:2024cv00038
Plaintiff: Brison Stephenson
Defendant: Phillips, Daniels, Jacob and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClure v. Trumbull County et al.
as 4:2024cv00116
Plaintiff: Kristina McClure and Colton McClure, Deceased
Defendant: Trumbull County, Paul S Monroe, Sheriff, Daniel Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Reynolds v. Puckett et al
as 5:2024cv00012
Plaintiff: Aaron Reynolds
Defendant: Nurse Practioner ANR Joyce Puckett, Tracy Bird and Daniel Akers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reynolds v. Puckett et al
as 5:2024cv00010
Plaintiff: Aaron Reynolds
Defendant: Joyce L. Puckett, Tracy Bird and Daniel Akers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Taylor et al
as 2:2024cv02024
Plaintiff: Henry Morris
Defendant: Daniel J. Taylor and Spragins, Barnett, Cobb & Butler, Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cory Mullen v. Jeff Tanner
as 24-1004
Petitioner: CORY DANIEL MULLEN
Respondent: JEFF TANNER, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?