Cases 41 - 50 of 3,510
Robertson v. David Paul
as 5:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
Demetrius M. Robertson
Respondent:
David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Daramis Sharkey v. James Holloway
as 24-5145
Petitioner:
DARAMIS LEE SHARKEY
Respondent:
JAMES M. HOLLOWAY, Warden
Collum v. USA
as 5:2024cv00323
Petitioner:
Terry M. Collum
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Luster v. USA
as 5:2024cv00313
Petitioner:
Vernon M. Luster
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Woodley Sr. v. Young et al
as 2:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
Jamal F. Woodley Sr.
Defendant:
David C Young, Evan Poole, Toure' McCord and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Oppy et al
as 2:2024cv00681
Plaintiff:
David M Smith
Defendant:
Mr. J. Oppy, Mr. Chinn, Mr. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Hollis v. Holloway et al
as 3:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Horace Hollis
Defendant:
James M. Holloway, Eugene Lewis, Cpl. f/n/u White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aaron Clark, IV v. C. Wilson, et al
as 24-1128
Plaintiff:
AARON CLARK, IV
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PERTTU, Resident Unit Manager, in personal capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SKYTTA, in personal capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MICHAELSON, in personal capacity and others
Jones v. Shelby County Criminal Justice Center
as 2:2024cv02100
Plaintiff:
Pierre M. Jones
Defendant:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demetrius McBride v. Bienvenido Canlas, et al
as 24-1114
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS MCBRIDE and DEMETRIUS DARNELL MCBRIDE
Defendant:
BIENVENIDO CANLAS, MD, CHRISTI M. CORPE, RN, CARMEN MCINTYRE, Medical Director of Prisons and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
