Cases 41 - 50 of 4,676
Cook v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al.
as 1:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
William H. Cook, III
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Colette Peters, Warden David LeMaster and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Thomason v. Knight
as 5:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Thomason
Defendant:
David Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Knight et al
as 5:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Kelly Michelle Johnson
Defendant:
Jailer David Knight, Nurse Kristy and Deputy Jailer Jennifer Bounds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Maness et al
as 5:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Clarence Vaughn
Defendant:
Blake Maness, John Michael Hill, David Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castro-Mota v. Bobby et al.
as 4:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
Santos Castro-Mota
Defendant:
Warden David Bobby, Cousel Master, Counsel Haad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Franklin County Corrections Center et al
as 2:2024cv01817
Plaintiff:
David Daniel Richardson
Defendant:
Franklin County Corrections Center, Nurse Linda Doe and Nurse Sandy Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Robert Annabel, II v. Sherman Campbell, et al
as 24-1322
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANNABEL, II
Defendant:
SHERMAN CAMPBELL, Warden, DAVID MESSER, CHRISTINA BATES and others
Preston v. Davids et al
as 2:2024cv10997
Plaintiff:
Harvey Lee Preston
Defendant:
John Davids, Leoncie Murkarurinda, David Maranka and others
Tyler v. Hansen et al
as 2:2024cv10980
Plaintiff:
Kevin Tyler
Defendant:
Karen Hansen, David Leyton and Chris Swanson
Crawley #230375 v. Hope College et al
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Walter Crawley #230375
Defendant:
Hope College, Richard Raymond, David Stubbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
