Cases 41 - 50 of 86
Kenneth Storey v. James Duke
as 15-5190
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH L. STOREY
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES DUKES, Warden
Damien Sublett v. Randy White, et al
as 14-6513
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMIEN SUBLETT
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY WHITE, DUKE PETTIT, BRUCE VON DWINGELO and others
Tucker #207829 et al v. Finco et al
as 1:2014cv01153
Plaintiff:
Rudy Tucker #207829, James Calhoun #187246, Kenneth Clark #191632 and others
Defendant:
Tom Finco, Mike Martin, Brad Purves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dukes v. Smith
as 3:2014cv00638
Petitioner:
Norman Dukes, III
Defendant:
Aaron Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dukes v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 1:2014cv00545
Petitioner:
Darnell M. Dukes
Respondent:
Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Force v. Pettit et al
as 5:2014cv00004
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Force
Defendant:
Duke Pettit, Virgil K. Hughes and Gary Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joe Browder, Jr. v. Ky State Prison Officials, et al
as 13-6659
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE ALEXANDER BROWDER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
KENTUCKY STATE PRISON OFFICIALS, John Does and Jane Does, PHILLIP PARKER, Warden, JOHN DOE, President of Correctcare Integrated Health, Inc. and others
Johnson v. Moore et al
as 5:2013cv00225
Plaintiff:
Fleece Johnson
Defendant:
Richard Moore, Amy Fisher, Patti Duke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. White et al
as 5:2013cv00131
Plaintiff:
Christopher Montgomery
Defendant:
Randy White and Duke Pettit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker #207829 et al v. Finco et al
as 1:2013cv00823
Plaintiff:
Rudy Tucker #207829, James Calhoun #187246, Kenneth Clark #191632 and others
Defendant:
Tom Finco, Mike Martin, Brad Purves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
