Cases 41 - 50 of 805
Bradley v. Rewerts
as 1:2023cv11154
Petitioner:
Benjamin Edward-Henry Bradley
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Henry v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2023cv02256
Plaintiff:
Calvin Henry, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Shelby County, Mayor Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Cohen
as 2:2023cv11148
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Clarence Henry Cohen
Elayan et al v. U.S. Department of State et al
as 5:2023cv00512
Plaintiff:
Rami Mohammad Elayan and Naheda Saber Mohammad Ali
Defendant:
U.S. Department of State, Antony Blinken, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Avery Sarten v. Buddy Bradshaw, et al
as 23-5292
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AVERY EUGENE SARTEN
Defendant:
BUDDY BRADSHAW, HENRY J. CULLEN, JULIA C. HURLEY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RACHEL MOORE and VALI KHAIROLLAHI
Small v. Alexander et al
as 1:2023cv00572
Plaintiff:
Shawnnetta Small
Defendant:
Renauld Alexander, Henry Oniche, Michael Bluitt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Brown v. George et al
as 2:2023cv10675
Defendant:
Tony George, Eric, Tyrone Gray and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Brown
Day et al v. Knox County Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
Steven Day, LaShawn L. Johnson, Robert Atkins and others
Defendant:
Knox County Sheriff Office, Tom Spangler, Daughtry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farmer v. Henry Ford Health System et al
as 2:2023cv10212
Plaintiff:
Bryan Farmer
Defendant:
Henry Ford Health System, Jane Doe 1 Known as "CK/RN", Corizon Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Phillips
as 3:2023cv00053
Petitioner:
Henry Wayne Russell
Respondent:
Shawn Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
