Cases 41 - 50 of 78
Donnal v. Perez et al
as 3:2015cv01550
Plaintiff:
Edward Eugene Donnal
Defendant:
Carlos Perez, Kristine Edwards, Dr. Patell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ratliff v. DeBaun et al
as 5:2015cv00144
Plaintiff:
James Ratliff
Defendant:
Joann DeBaun and Donnie Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raleem-X et al v. Ward et al
as 2:2015cv11905
Plaintiff:
Raleem-X, Iesha Northington, Poncietta Earle and others
Defendant:
A. Ward, Kevin Rogers, B. Kamin and others
Tragas v. USA
as 1:2015cv11935
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Joanne Tragas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Dennis #511759 v. Heyns et al
as 1:2015cv00087
Plaintiff:
Keith Virgil Dennis #511759
Defendant:
Daniel H. Heyns, Joanne Sheldon, Steven Fletcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamison v. Anzalone et al
as 4:2014cv13847
Plaintiff:
Robert Jamison
Defendant:
Anna Marie Anzalone , Burke Castleberry , Joanne Holly and others
Jamison v. Holly et al
as 2:2014cv13394
Plaintiff:
Robert Jamison
Defendant:
Joanne E Holly and Lenawee County Probation
Devon Parker v. Joe Easterling, et al
as 14-5699
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEVON J. PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE EASTERLING, Warden, Warden of H.C.C. F. In his official and individual capacity, DEANNE MILLS, Job Coordinator of H.C.C.F.; In her official and individual capacity, DOROTHY ROBERTSON, Unit Manager; In her official and Individual capacity and others
Defendant:
CORRECTION CORPORATION OF AMERICA, et al
Devon Parker v. Fontella Mason, et al
as 14-5373
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEVON J. PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
FONTELLA MASON, Alternative Disciplinary Hearing Officer
Defendant:
JOE EASTERLING, Warden, HCCF Warden, DARLENE MATTHEWS, Librarian, JOANNE HENSON, Unit Manager and others
Caldwell v. Southfield, City of et al
as 2:2013cv15283
Plaintiff:
Timothy Caldwell
Defendant:
Southfield, City of, Southfield Police Department, Blake Matatall and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
