Cases 41 - 50 of 91
Gaddy et al v. Land et al
as 1:2017cv00223
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gaddy and Carol Gaddy
Defendant:
George Dwain Land, Clayton Smith, Chad Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Roy Durham, Jr. v. Rob Jeffreys, et al
as 17-3636
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY A. DURHAM, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ROB L. JEFFREYS, Warden, Chief, Bureau of Classification, MICHAEL SHEETS, Warden, W.C.I., JUSTIN JOHNSON, Case Manager and others
Thomas Reese v. Ohio Dept of Rehabilitation, et al
as 17-3380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS REESE
Defendant - Appellee:
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTIONS, TROOPER COSTERELLA, [UNKNOWN] TROOPER and others
Clark v. Ramey et al
as 5:2017cv00044
Plaintiff:
Wilson Reese Clark
Defendant:
Karen Ramey, Bruce Bauer, Jill Shelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goldwire v. Mohr et al
as 2:2017cv00064
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Goldwire
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Jason Reese, Holly Uhrig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goldwire v. Mohr et al
as 1:2016cv01178
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Goldwire
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Jason Reese, Holly Uhrig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamble v. McCracken County, Kentucky et al
as 5:2016cv00195
Plaintiff:
Bennie Lee Gamble, Jr.
Defendant:
McCracken County, Kentucky, Gary Reese and Danny Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Schuette et al
as 2:2016cv14237
Plaintiff:
Donnell DeFrance Williams
Defendant:
Bill Schuette, Daniel H. Heyns, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON and others
Reese v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 4:2016cv02660
Plaintiff:
Thomas Reese
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Trooper Costerella, Unknown Trooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spicer, v. Parker et al
as 1:2016cv01281
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Reese Spicer, Sr.
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Damon Hininger, B. Dietz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
