Cases 51 - 60 of 560
Coleman v. Sander et al
as 3:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Khalil Coleman
Defendant:
Rob Sander and Kenton County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Meade County Detention Center
as 3:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Khalil Coleman
Defendant:
Kenton County Detention Center, Meade County Detention Center, Todd County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. USA
as 3:2023cv00030
Petitioner:
Rashaud L. Coleman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Witherell v. Stricklin et al
as 2:2023cv10153
Plaintiff:
Daniel Witherell
Defendant:
Brian Stricklin, Kim Ferris, Ricky Coleman and others
Raymond Watison v. Grady Perry, et al
as 23-5059
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND WATISON, also known as King Belal
Defendant / Appellee:
GRADY PERRY, Warden, ASSOCIATE WARDEN SIDNEY CARTER, LARRY COLEMAN, Assistant Chief of Security and others
Coleman v. Cooper et al
as 2:2023cv10072
Plaintiff:
Derrick Coleman
Defendant:
Jessica R. Cooper, Michael J. McCarthy, Kenneth E. Frazer and others
Coleman v. Parris
as 3:2022cv00448
Plaintiff:
Wesley Coleman
Defendant:
Mike Parris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dieterle et al v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 3:2022cv02247
Plaintiff:
Ryan J. Dieterle, Diana Swisshelm and David J. Dieterle
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, N.L. Sterling and Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryan v. State of Michigan et al
as 2:2022cv13002
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
State of Michigan, Michigan Department of Corrections, Corizon Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cantrell v. Scioto County, Ohio/Scioto Co. Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2022cv00739
Plaintiff:
Jessie Cantrell
Defendant:
Scioto County, Ohio/Scioto Co. Board of Commissioners, Scottie Powell, Bryan Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
