Cases 51 - 60 of 68
Mitchem v. Sheriff, Butler County, OH et al
as 1:2018cv00426
Plaintiff:
Mbiya Mitchem
Defendant:
Sheriff, Butler County, OH and Rucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Corizon Correctional Health Care et al
as 2:2018cv11608
Plaintiff:
L.T. Tucker
Defendant:
Corizon Correctional Health Care, Kristine Nyquist and Chung Oh
Edward Williams, et al v. Donald Schismenos, et al
as 17-3786
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD BRENT WILLIAMS and THERESA M. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD SCHISMENOS, Badge No. 950, Individually and in his official capacity, JESSIE LEESER, Badge No. 1030, Individually and in his official capacity and CITY OF AKRON, OH
Nathaniel Ferguson v. City of South Euclid, Ohio
as 17-3433
Petitioner - Appellant:
NATHANIEL FERGUSON
Respondent - Appellee:
CITY OF SOUTH EUCLID, OH
Ryan v. Carson City Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2017cv10562
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
Carson City Correctional Facility, FNU Holmes, FNU Spurlling and others
Turner #169637 v. Oh et al
as 2:2016cv00256
Plaintiff:
Gregory S. Turner #169637
Defendant:
Unknown Oh, Sabrina S. Snider, David Finnagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doss #785510 v. Mackie et al
as 2:2016cv00135
Plaintiff:
Dominique Doss #785510
Defendant:
Thomas Mackie, Shane Place, Unknown Yankovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ragland #713098 v. Place et al
as 2:2016cv00075
Petitioner:
James Ragland #713098
Respondent:
Shane Place, Oh Chung, Gloria Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mays #218101 v. Hemmila et al
as 2:2015cv00154
Plaintiff:
Marcus D. Mays #218101
Defendant:
Kevin Hemmila, Michael Minerick, Noah Bessley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryan #787263 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv00022
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Ryan #787263
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Michigan, State of, Corizon Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
