Cases 51 - 60 of 121
Koprowski v. Baker et al
as 6:2011cv00183
Plaintiff:
Stephen Ted Koprowski
Defendant:
Karen Bennett Baker, Jorge Vazquez-Velazquez, Richard R. Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Carl Hunter v. Alger Maximum Correctional Fac, et al
as 11-1668
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL HUNTER
Defendant - Appellee:
ALGER MAXIMUM CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, named as Alger Max Prison, CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden, UNKNOWN RUTTER, ADW and others
White #198559 v. Berrios
as 2:2011cv00148
Plaintiff:
Brian White #198559
Defendant:
Miguel Berrios, Ted Hammon and Elizabeth Clement
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Dionne v. Barbara Sampson, et al
as 11-1477
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL DIONNE
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA S. SAMPSON, JAMES ATTERBERRY, MIGUAL BERRIOS and others
Hunter #229916 v. Michigan Parole Board, et al
as 2:2011cv00122
Plaintiff:
Carl Hunter #229916
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board and Ted Hammon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter #229916 v. Alger Maximum Correctional Facility, et al
as 2:2011cv00100
Plaintiff:
Carl Hunter #229916
Defendant:
Alger Maximum Correctional Facility, Catherine Bauman, Unknown Rutter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter #229916 v. Hammon, et al
as 2:2011cv00101
Plaintiff:
Carl Hunter #229916
Defendant:
Ted Hammon, Michigan Department of Corrections Parole and Pardon Commutation Board, People of the State of Michigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers #095405 v. Granholm et al
as 1:2011cv00042
Plaintiff:
Floyd Chambers #095405
Defendant:
Jennifer M. Granholm, James Atterberry, Barbara Sampson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Plummer et al
as 3:2010cv00463
Plaintiff:
William H Payne, III
Defendant:
Phil Plummer, Corrections Officer Pinney, Jane and John Does Correction Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
