Cases 71 - 80 of 176
Johnson v. Hammond et al
as 1:2015cv00102
Plaintiff:
Christopher Anton Johnson
Defendant:
Jim Hammond, Hamilton County, State of Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frazier v. Crump et al
as 1:2015cv00089
Plaintiff:
David Travis Frazier
Defendant:
Steven Crump, Jery Estes, Caroll Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cope v. Jefferson County Probation / Parole Office et al
as 3:2015cv00255
Plaintiff:
William Douglas Cope, III
Defendant:
Jefferson County Probation / Parole Office, Chris Query and Cris Bennitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smither v. Vonckx et al
as 4:2014cv00121
Plaintiff:
Jordan Smither
Defendant:
Derek Vonckx and Office of Probation/Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston v. Cuyahoga County Probation Department et al
as 1:2014cv02441
Plaintiff:
Stanley Houston
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Probation Department and Michael P. Donnelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamison v. Lenawee County Probation Department
as 2:2014cv13995
Plaintiff:
Robert Jamison
Defendant:
Lenawee County Probation Department
Scruggs v. Schofield, et al
as 3:2014cv01900
Plaintiff:
Jesse Scruggs
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Tennessee Department of Correction and Board of Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamison v. Holly et al
as 2:2014cv13394
Plaintiff:
Robert Jamison
Defendant:
Joanne E Holly and Lenawee County Probation
Frederick Harris, Jr. v. Robert Goebel, Jr., et al
as 14-2043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK J. HARRIS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT E. GOEBEL, JR., Probate Judge, RENEE F. ALEXANDRONI, Official Court Reporter, EVA A. KIPPER, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney and others
Shy Heath v. Hannah Gibson, et al
as 14-5932
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHY HEATH
Respondent - Appellee:
HANNAH GIBSON, Probation and Parole Officer and SHANNON JONES, Chair of the Kentucky Parole Board
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
