Cases 1 - 10 of 1,453
Logan v. Lincoln County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2024cv00051
Defendant:
Lincoln County, Tennessee, N. Andy Myrick, Cindy Wiseman and others
Plaintiff:
Kirk H Logan, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00700
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Robinson v. Walburn et al
as 5:2024cv11721
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Steward Robinson
Defendant:
Melissa Dykman, Robert M. Hayes, Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Trice #192845 v. Koehler et al
as 1:2024cv00856
Petitioner:
RESTRICTED FILER John Eldridge Trice #192845
Respondent:
Brian L. Mackin, Ronald Koehler, Ypsilanti Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Moore v. Whight et al
as 0:2024cv00064
Defendant:
Paul Holebook, Rebecca Unknown, Evex Olldham and others
Plaintiff:
Timmathy Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02567
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Tompkins #518783 v. Thompson et al
as 1:2024cv00719
Respondent:
David A. Thompson, Jennifer Houke-Born, Michael Burgess and others
Petitioner:
Boston Jermaine Tompkins #518783
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Lineberry et al
as 3:2024cv00715
Defendant:
Amber Lineberry and Board of Parole
Plaintiff:
Daniel H. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Jones v. Amber Lineberry, et al
as 24-5684
Plaintiff:
DANIEL H. JONES
Defendant:
BOARD OF PAROLE, Parole Hearings Division and AMBER LINEBERRY, Parole Administrator
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
