Cases 1 - 10 of 450
Tillie #636229 v. Lofton et al
as 1:2024cv00625
Plaintiff:
Phillip Randall Tillie #636229
Defendant:
Unknown Lofton, Unknown Ward, Unknown Bielas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. USA
as 6:2024cv00081
Petitioner:
Patrick Baker
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Petersmark #766394 v. Burgess et al
as 1:2024cv00604
Plaintiff:
Joseph Robert Petersmark #766394
Defendant:
Michael Burgess, J. Clouse, Jason Erway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson #753595 v. Baker et al
as 2:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Darren Deon Johnson #753595
Defendant:
Unknown Baker, Unknown Quinn and Unknown Whitley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easley v. Didion et al.
as 3:2024cv00943
Plaintiff:
Easley
Defendant:
Correction Officer Megan Marie Didion, Correction Officer Spiegner and Ms. Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Scott v. Baker et al
as 3:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Avren Scott
Defendant:
Mark Baker and Julie Kaelin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson #753595 v. Baker et al
as 2:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Darren Deon Johnson #753595
Defendant:
Unknown Baker and Unknown Quinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petersmark v. Burgess et al
as 4:2024cv11272
Plaintiff:
Joseph Robert Petersmark
Defendant:
Michael Burgess, J. Clouse, Jason Erway and others
Krzywkowski v. Mohr et al
as 3:2024cv00850
Plaintiff:
Grady Krzywkowski
Defendant:
Mike Davis, Warden Keith Foley, Dessey Cheers and others
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Calhoun, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Herbert May
Defendant:
Calhoun, County of, Kurtis Cunkle, Sterling Ladd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
