Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Lawson v. Burkhart et al
as 7:2015cv00104
Plaintiff:
James D. Lawson
Defendant:
B. J. Burkhart, Derrick Moore and Freddie Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodge v. Burkhart et al
as 6:2015cv00105
Plaintiff:
Douglas M. Hodge
Defendant:
B. J. Burkhart, Ken Casteel, Dan Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Work v. Dickson County Jail, et al
as 11-5521
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN JESSE WORK
Defendant - Appellee:
DICKSON COUNTY JAIL, TOM WALL, Sheriff, VANCE BOKER, Captain and others
James Taylor v. First Medical Management, et al
as 10-6411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES WILLIAM TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
FIRST MEDICAL MANAGEMENT, (Director) Lois Deberry Special Needs Facility (Health Care Providers), F/N/U JONES, CO, Female Correctional Officer, F/N/U JONES, CO, Male Correctional Officer and others
Thomas v. Wolfenbarger
as 2:2010cv00295
Petitioner:
B. J. Thomas #224033
Respondent:
Hugh Wolfenbarger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas #224033 v. Woods
as 2:2010cv00292
Petitioner:
B. J. Thomas #224033
Respondent:
Jeffrey Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Craig Beene v. RassekiMuhammed, et al
as 10-5730
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG L. BEENE
Defendant - Appellee:
RASSEKIMUHAMMED, P.A., B. J. RHODES, IISA, ALEXANDER, Staff M.D. and others
Taylor v. First Medical Management et al
as 3:2010cv00451
Plaintiff:
James William Taylor
Defendant:
First Medical Management, f/n/u Jones, Betty Thorten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beene v. Rasseki et al
as 3:2010cv00285
Plaintiff:
Craig L. Beene
Defendant:
Muhammed Rasseki, B. J. Rhodes, Dr. Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennedy v. Stallard et al
as 6:2010cv00043
Plaintiff:
Verdell Kennedy, Jr.
Defendant:
Curt Stallard, B. J. Burkhart, Geona Snelling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
