Cases 1 - 10 of 292
Cain v. McCustion et al
as 5:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Cain and Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Lt Slade McCustion, Jailer Ken Claud, Major Thomas Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Jerone Alexander
Defendant:
Cynthia D Davis, Charles O'Connor, N. Brabson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel v. Fighter-Daniel et al
as 2:2024cv11218
Plaintiff:
Allen David Daniel
Defendant:
Teri Fighter-Daniel, M. Sorensen, Barber and others
Lauck v. Black
as 3:2024cv00534
Petitioner:
Ronald Dean Lauck
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jefferson v. Black
as 1:2024cv00729
Petitioner:
Earl C. Jefferson, II
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cain v. Page et al
as 5:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Sgt Noah Page, Ofc Luke Jornstead, Ofc Tayor Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black #359135 v. Cook et al
as 1:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Eliejuawan James Black #359135
Defendant:
Unknown Cook, Unknown Ryan, Unknown Schutt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Isaiah Harris v. Annette Chambers-Smith, et al
as 24-3294
Plaintiff:
ISAIAH S. HARRIS, SR.
Defendant:
ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, in her individual and official capacity as Director of the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction, WARDEN KENNETH BLACK, in his individual and official capacity as Warden of the Richland Correctional Institution and JOHN AND JANE DOE, 1-10; in their individual and official capacity as Mailroom Staff, Clerks, and Supervisors of the Richland Correctional Institution
Michael Marchak, Jr. v. Kenneth Black
as 24-3182
Petitioner:
MICHAEL MARCHAK, JR.
Respondent:
KENNETH BLACK, Warden, Richland Correctional Institution
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
