Cases 1 - 10 of 161
Kenneth Mobley v. DOJ, et al
as 24-5477
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MOBLEY
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN F. J. BOWERS, FCI Memphis and others
Anderson v. Bowers Towing et al.
as 5:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L. Anderson
Defendant:
Bowers Towing and Akron Police Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Tyrrell et al v. Nagy et al
as 2:2024cv10250
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Thomas, Steven Sanchez, John Warren Ross and others
Defendant:
Richard Lee Robinson, William Charles Valkema, Creston Jerome Hicks and others
Petitioner:
Bobbie Maxwell, Benjamin Ballge, Richard Schall and others
Vrancea v. Bowers
as 2:2023cv02701
Petitioner:
Ion Catalin Vrancea
Respondent:
F. J. Bowers and Warden C. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vaughan v. Thomas et al
as 2:2023cv02671
Plaintiff:
Beau Cameron Vaughan
Defendant:
Mary Thomas, Mr. Byrd, Mr. West and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Kwaning v. Harrison
as 2:2023cv02658
Petitioner:
Mohammed Kwaning
Respondent:
Warden Bowers and Warden Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Encarnacion-Lafontaine v. Bowers
as 2:2023cv02652
Petitioner:
Edgar Encarnacion-Lafontaine
Respondent:
Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Oziel Cantu v. F. Bowers
as 23-5853
Petitioner / Appellant:
OZIEL CANTU
Respondent / Appellee:
F. J. BOWERS, Warden
Clinton v. Bowers
as 2:2023cv02548
Petitioner:
Gregory K. Clinton
Respondent:
Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bowers v. USA
as 5:2023cv01643
Petitioner:
Nicholas B. Bowers
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
