Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Nathaniel Rice v. Richard Jones, et al
as 23-3373
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL D. RICE
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERIFF RICHARD K. JONES, WARDEN/CAPTAIN NICK FISHER, LIEUTENANT ADAMS and others
Rice v. Ross et al
as 1:2022cv00716
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel D. Rice
Defendant:
Trooper Tyler S. Ross, Sgt. Trooper John Doe #1, Sgt. Trooper John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nathaniel Rice v. Richard Jones, et al
as 22-3972
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL D. RICE
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERIFF RICHARD K. JONES, in his individual and official capacity, JOHN DOE #1, believed to be Trooper Tyler, Ohio State Trooper, in his individual and office capacity, JANE DOE #1, Butler County Jail Officer, in her individual and official capacity and others
Rice v. Williams
as 4:2020cv01341
Petitioner:
Mark D. Rice
Respondent:
Warden Mark Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rice v. Bracy
as 3:2017cv01348
Petitioner:
Andre D. Rice
Respondent:
Charmain Bracy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rice v. USA
as 3:2016cv00470
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Sheila D Rice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rice v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2011cv03121
Plaintiff:
Jacobi D. Rice, Sr.
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, Bill Oldham, Robert Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rice v. City of Radcliff, Kentucky et al
as 3:2011cv00447
Plaintiff:
Kevin D. Rice
Defendant:
City of Radcliff, Kentucky , Radcliff Police Department , James Lark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rice v. Welch
as 3:2010cv01916
Petitioner:
Andre D. Rice
Respondent:
Robert C. Welch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rice v. Lucas County Correction Center et al
as 3:2009cv02970
Plaintiff:
Andre D. Rice, Sr.
Defendant:
Lucas County Correction Center and Lucas County Medical Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
