Cases 1 - 10 of 398
Gilbert v. Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al.
as 1:2024cv01038
Plaintiff:
Bobby Dean Gilbert
Defendant:
Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Warden Kenntheh Black, C/O Kisner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Dickerson
as 1:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Dean Miller
Defendant:
Stanley Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lauck v. Black
as 3:2024cv00534
Petitioner:
Ronald Dean Lauck
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Porter v. USA
as 2:2024cv01280
Petitioner:
Larry Dean Porter
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brumbach v. Smith et al.
as 4:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Mason H. Brumbach
Defendant:
Officer Shane Smith, Deputy Dennis Garito, Sergeant Cody Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fort v. Parker et al.
as 3:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Shawnathan Delrea Fort
Defendant:
Dean Debra Parker, Jean Cunningham, Jenna Motuza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nichols v. Warnecke
as 2:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Randy Dean Nichols
Defendant:
John Michael Warnecke, Mathew Ellis, Adam Rummer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Goding v. Saaranen et al
as 2:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Dean Anthony Goding and Dean Goding
Defendant:
Keith Raffaelli, Kevin Coppo, Anthony Autio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Nessel et al
as 4:2023cv13094
Plaintiff:
Larry Dean Garrett
Defendant:
Dana Nessel, John Doe, Norene Adams and others
Qualls v. Crow et al
as 2:2023cv03889
Plaintiff:
Eric A. Qualls
Defendant:
Fred W Crow, III, Dan W Favreau, Richard Walton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
