Cases 1 - 10 of 53
SMITH v. COCROFT et al
as 2:2024cv03215
Petitioner:
DEONDRE E. SMITH
Respondent:
Judge Kimberly Cocroft, JEFF ZEZECH, GEORGE WHARTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Paul
as 5:2023cv00132
Petitioner:
Ronald E. Smith
Respondent:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Montgomery v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv00275
Plaintiff:
Gary Montgomery
Defendant:
Philip E. Smith, Lesley Burnett Montgomery, Doug Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Sumner et al
as 6:2022cv00216
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Smith
Defendant:
Stephanie Sumner, Lawson and Carrie Cunnagin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Smith v. Sumner et al
as 6:2022cv00203
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Smith
Defendant:
Stephanie Sumner, Ms. Lawson and Carrie Cunnagin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Smith
as 5:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
Avren Scott
Defendant:
E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith et al v. Clark et al
as 3:2021cv00103
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Department of Correction Medical Department, Sgt Elmore, Martin Baker and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe, Detainees - Inmates and Shawn E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
as 1:2020cv00904
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2020cv05830
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2020cv05915
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
