Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Joyce #251901 v. Eli Lilly & Company et al
as 2:2020cv00208
Defendant:
David Dawdy, Susan L. Clark, Ashlee J. Hansinger and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric R. Joyce #251901
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jefferson v. Corizon Health Care Providers et al
as 3:2012cv00988
Plaintiff:
Samuel Jefferson
Defendant:
Corizon Health Care Providers, Eli Lilly Corp. and (f/n/u) Greenwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuel Jefferson v. Mary O'Toole, et al
as 12-6098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL JEFFERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY O'TOOLE, CORIZON CORP., F/N/U "BARLESS" and others
Brown v. Eli Lilly Corp
as 3:2012cv00373
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Brown
Defendant:
Eli Lilly Corp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jefferson v. O'Toole et al
as 3:2012cv00576
Plaintiff:
Samuel Jefferson
Defendant:
Molly O'Toole, Corizon Corp., f/n/u Barless and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuel Jefferson v. Ferrer, Poirot & Wansbrough, et al
as 11-6366
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL JEFFERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
FERRER, POIROT & WANSBROUGH, ELI LILLY CORPORATION, GARRETSON LAW FIRM, LLC and others
Jefferson v. State of Tennessee Department of Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities et al
as 3:2011cv00288
Plaintiff:
Samuel Jefferson
Defendant:
State of Tennessee Department of Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities , Western Mental Health Institute , Middle Tennessee Mental Health Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jefferson v. Ferrer, Poirot, and Wansbrough et al
as 3:2010cv00754
Plaintiff:
Samuel Jefferson
Defendant:
Ferrer, Poirot, and Wansbrough, Eli Lilly Corporation and Garretson Law Firm, LLC
Consolidated Defendant:
Mat Daniel, Middle Tennessee Mental Health Institute, State of Tennessee Department of Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
