Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3880
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Williams v. Beaver Creek Police Dept. et al
as 1:2022cv00483
Plaintiff:
James Williams, IV
Defendant:
Beaver Creek Police Dept. and Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11562
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Darek Lathan v. Matthew Simko, et al
as 22-3439
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAREK LATHAN
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW DAVID SIMKO, Assistant United States Attorney, GEORGE CARAM STEEH, III, United States District Court Judge, KYLE FULMER, Federal Bureau of Investigation Special Agent and others
Brock v. Unidentified Members of "Lynch Mob" et al
as 3:2021cv00522
Plaintiff:
Dominique J. Brock and Americo J. Brock
Defendant:
Unidentified Members of "Lynch Mob", KY DOC Personall Board Chairman, Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 3:2021cv00095
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Central Intelligence Agency, Warden and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
