Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Berryman v. Deluca et al
as 2:2024cv11038
Plaintiff:
Philip W. Berryman
Defendant:
Tiffany Deluca, Labron, George Stephenson and others
Braunskill v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Ralphiell Braunskill
Defendant:
Agent Danielle Smith, Clermont Co. Sheriff Dept., Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kellie Farris v. Oakland County, MI, et al
as 23-1739
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KELLIE FARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
OAKLAND COUNTY, MI, DEPUTY MARK BOWERING, DEPUTY ERIN VINCENT and others
Burton v. Saph et al
as 2:2023cv11093
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Burton
Defendant:
Jay Saph, McCinnis, Kim Farris and others
Farris v. Maury County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Carlos M. Farris
Defendant:
Maury County Jail, Trinity Food Services, f/n/u Maddox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prince v. Farris et al
as 5:2023cv10405
Plaintiff:
Timothy Prince
Defendant:
Farris, Simmit, Pary and others
Farmer v. Henry Ford Health System et al
as 2:2023cv10212
Plaintiff:
Bryan Farmer
Defendant:
Henry Ford Health System, Jane Doe 1 Known as "CK/RN", Corizon Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson-Day v. Farris
as 2:2023cv10045
Plaintiff:
Maurice Dawson-Day
Defendant:
Kim Farris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson-Day #687596 v. Farris
as 1:2022cv01227
Plaintiff:
Maurice Dawson-Day #687596
Defendant:
Kim Farris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Philip Berryman v. George Stephenson, et al
as 22-1971
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILIP BERRYMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGE STEPHENSON, in his individual and official capacity jointly and severally, KRISTOPHER STEECE, in his individual and official capacity jointly and severally, ALAN GREASON, in his individual and official capacity jointly and severally and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
