Cases 1 - 10 of 280
Ketchens v. Rewerts
as 2:2024cv11388
Petitioner:
Leonard Michael Ketchens
Respondent:
Randee Rewerts
Ellis v. Harrell et al
as 3:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Leonard Ellis
Defendant:
f/n/u Harrell, Rutherford County Jail and Rutherford County Shirfe Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jon Kean v. Stott, et al
as 24-1209
Plaintiff:
JON PAUL KEAN
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER STOTT, personal and official capacity, CORRECTIONS OFFICER OLSON, personal and official capacity, CORRECTIONS OFFICER GODELL, personal and official capacity and others
Kean #210913 v. Stott et al
as 1:2023cv01205
Plaintiff:
Jon Paul Kean #210913
Defendant:
Unknown Stott, Unknown Olson, Unknown Godell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Feiler, Jr. v. Michael Johnson, et al
as 23-1809
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES EDGAR FEILER, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DETROIT POLICE INVESTIGATING OFFICER MICHAEL JOHNSON, WAYNE COUNTY PROSECUTOR RAGAN LAKE, WAYNE COUNTY PRSECUTOR ELIZABETH ANN TAYLOR DORNIK and others
Roseman #248250 v. Wolthuis et al
as 1:2023cv00568
Plaintiff:
Wilber Leonard Roseman #248250
Defendant:
Unknown Wolthuis, Unknown Part(y)(ies), Patricia Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel #872864 v. Leonard et al
as 1:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
Demetri Daniel #872864
Defendant:
Unknown Leonard and Unknown Bohen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ostrander v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv10803
Plaintiff:
Leonard Dorance Ostrander
Defendant:
R. Smith and John Doe
Ostrander v. Gilley et al
as 2:2023cv10768
Plaintiff:
Leonard Dorance Ostrander
Defendant:
Adam Gilley and Tanner Beckwith
Bankston, Jr. v. Gray
as 1:2023cv00692
Petitioner:
Leonard M. Bankston, Sr.
Respondent:
Warden David W. Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
