Cases 1 - 10 of 185
Brooks v. Hawkins County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Defendant:
Ronnie Lawson, Dallas Dunn, Dean and others
Plaintiff:
Donnie Ray Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thurman v. Crews et al
as 4:2024cv00063
Defendant:
Brianna Capel, Stacy Gibson, Cookie Crews and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Thurman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Sargus et al
as 2:2024cv02175
Plaintiff:
William T. Dawson, Jr.
Defendant:
Judge Edmund A Sargus, Jr, Christin Werner, Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Michael Burnett v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 24-1366
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANGELO BURNETT
Defendant:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director of MDOC, in her official capacity, LIEUTENANT TAGGET, in individual capacity, LIEUTENANT BORIS, in individual capacity and others
Beraut v. Mazza et al
as 3:2024cv00352
Defendant:
Lane Erwin, Kevin Mazza, Brian Owens and others
Plaintiff:
Genesson Beraut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hills v. Myers et al
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Lane Douglas Hills
Defendant:
Sheriff John Myers, Lt. Susan Taylor and Sgt. Dana Mobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Whited et al
as 5:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Ryan Johnson
Defendant:
Chris Whited, Lane Irwin, David Stambaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Grimes v. Tim Lane
as 24-5456
Petitioner:
ANTHONY THOMAS GRIMES
Respondent:
TIM LANE, Warden
Johnson v. Whited et al
as 3:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Ryan Johnson
Defendant:
Chris Whited, Lane Irwin, David Stambaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Musarra v. Lane et al
as 4:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Michael Musarra
Defendant:
Time Lane, Liggett Morris, Green River Correctional Complex and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
