Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,094
Scott v. Baker et al
as 3:2024cv00320
Plaintiff: Avren Scott
Defendant: Mark Baker and Julie Kaelin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Sturm et al
as 2:2024cv11274
Plaintiff: Mark White
Defendant: Sturm, Carter, Richardson and others
Mark Gooding v. Parole Board, et al
as 24-1438
Petitioner: MARK ANTHONY GOODING
Respondent: PAROLE BOARD and MICHELLE FLOYD, Warden
Larry Johnson, Sr. v. Lee Coffee, et al
as 24-5468
Plaintiff: LARRY D. JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant: LEE V. COFFEE, Assistant District Attorney (former). In individual and official capacity., ARTHUR THOMAS BENNETT, Judge Criminal Court. In individual and official capacity., GWENDOLYN ROOKS, General Sessions Court Judge. Individual capacity and others
Dawson v. Sargus et al
as 2:2024cv02175
Plaintiff: William T. Dawson, Jr.
Defendant: Judge Edmund A Sargus, Jr, Christin Werner, Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mark Hill v. Jennifer Pell, et al
as 24-3268
Plaintiff: MARK ANTHONY HILL
Defendant: JENNIFER PELL, SCOTT CRAWFORD, BRITTANY N. HAMM and others
Deas v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County et al
as 5:2024cv00123
Plaintiff: Deandrae Deas
Defendant: Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kenneth Atkerson, Jeramie Waak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas #684159 v. Jurva et al
as 2:2024cv00035
Plaintiff: Romero Monte Thomas #684159
Defendant: Leland Jurva, Mark Skytta, Nicholas Lanctot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fikes v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv00405
Plaintiff: Joshua Fikes
Defendant: Dustin Smith, Sheyenne Wilhelm and Mark Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Coleman v. Perhne et al
as 5:2024cv10624
Plaintiff: Mark A. Coleman
Defendant: Perhne, McCumber-Hemry and Nagy

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?