Cases 1 - 10 of 207
Michael Rich v. USA
as 24-1430
Petitioner:
MICHAEL KENNETH RICH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Giles v. Rich et al
as 1:2024cv11052
Plaintiff:
Kevin La'von Giles
Defendant:
Paul Rich, A. Morden, M. Tank and others
Phillip Jacobs v. Marion Correctional Institution, et al
as 24-3092
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP DOUGLAS JACOBS
Defendant:
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY and others
Philip v. Executive Clemency Unit et al
as 1:2024cv01014
Plaintiff:
Ashton Jamarr Philip
Defendant:
Executive Clemency Unit, Zane Duncan, Roberta Kustoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Otey v. Rich
as 3:2023cv00428
Petitioner:
Brandon I. Otey
Respondent:
D. Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thomas et al v. Montgomery et al
as 3:2023cv01204
Plaintiff:
Carvin Thomas and Terrell Lawrence
Defendant:
Richard Montgomery, Zane Duncan, Gary Faulcon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobs v. Marion Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2023cv01734
Plaintiff:
Phillip D. Jacobs and Phillip Douglas Jacobs
Defendant:
Marion Correctional Institution, Annette Chambers-Smith, Ohio Adult Parole (Board) Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilcox v. State of Ohio et al
as 2:2023cv02477
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Wilcox
Defendant:
State of Ohio, Lancaster Correctional Institution, C.O. Whitey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rich v. USA
as 2:2023cv11285
Petitioner:
Michael Kenneth Rich
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Tankesly v. TN Department of Corrections et al (PSLC1)
as 1:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Calvin-Otis Tankesly, Jr.
Defendant:
TN Department of Corrections, Lisa Helton, Lee Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
