Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Bush v. Gilley et al
as 6:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
Daymon Maurice Bush
Respondent:
J. Gilley, BOP and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Berry v. United States Attorney General
as 2:2023cv11425
Petitioner:
Duane Letroy Berry
Respondent:
United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Orlando Malone v. Carl Petty, et al
as 22-5394
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ORLANDO MALONE
Defendant / Appellee:
CARL F. PETTY, Bradley Co, Assistant District Attorney, CARROLL L. ROSS, Trial Judge, JERRY N. ESTES and others
Ardoin v. Bowens et al
as 2:2022cv02255
Petitioner:
Kevin Ardoin
Respondent:
Warden Bowens, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jamarr Kuilan v. John Zimmerman, et al
as 22-5331
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMARR JUAN KUILAN
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN ZIMMERMAN, in his individual and official capacity as Assistant District Attorney, ROYCE TAYLOR, in his individual and official capacity, JENNINGS H. JONES, in his individual and official capacity District Attorney General and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00476
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00949
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Berry v. United States Attorney General et al
as 2:2019cv10155
Respondent:
John Does and United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Duane L. Berry
Moose-Bey v. United States et al
as 6:2018cv00317
Defendant:
Kenneth Michael Warner, United States, David M. Ketchmark and others
Plaintiff:
Thirplus Tino Moose-Bey and Thirplus Moose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
