Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Robert Price v. MDOC, et al
as 24-1062
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOSEPH-LEWIS PRICE
Defendant:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ST. LOUIS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JOHN CHRISTIANSEN, Warden and others
Nickens #316282 v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv00815
Plaintiff:
Arthur S. Nickens #316282, III
Defendant:
M. Jones, J. Nelson, Unknown Stump and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards #956128 v. Valdez et al
as 1:2022cv01059
Plaintiff:
Inez Edwards and Inez Edwards #956128
Defendant:
Unknown Valdez and Unknown Stump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin #857010 v. MaCauley et al
as 1:2022cv01005
Plaintiff:
Laron Franklin #857010
Defendant:
Matt MaCauley, Joseph Thomas Nowicki, Matthew Schultz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hickey #342571 v. Stump et al
as 1:2022cv00865
Plaintiff:
Kainte Hickey #342571
Defendant:
Unknown Stump, Unknown Nelson, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor #940436 v. Stump et al
as 1:2022cv00530
Plaintiff:
Davariol Marquavis Taylor #940436
Defendant:
Unknown Stump, Unknown Hickey and Unknown Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv10219
Plaintiff:
Robert Price
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, St. Louis Central Corrections, John Christiansen and others
Mobley v. Sloss et al
as 5:2021cv00088
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Mobley
Defendant:
Officer Sloss, Jerrod Stump, Lt. Elko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Allen et al
as 3:2021cv00460
Defendant:
J Stump, Ms Gladden, Corr. Officer S Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Todd M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Allen et al
as 2:2021cv00295
Defendant:
J Stump, Ms Gladden, Corr. Officer S Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Todd M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
