Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Fedorovich v. Trinity Services Group, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv01009
Plaintiff:
Steven Fedorovich
Defendant:
Trinity Services Group, Inc. and Stark County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newson v. Trinity Services Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Devoris Antoine Newson
Defendant:
Trinity Services Group, Inc., f/n/u Wagner, f/n/u Daily and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ultimate Cakra Liberation, et al v. Trinity Services Group, Inc., et al
as 22-5789
Plaintiff:
ULTIMATE CAKRA LIBERATION, Tribunal
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES ORLANDO FIELDS, Noble:buddha-angavu:sishya and CHARLES ORLANDO FIELDS, aka Noble:buddha-angavu:sishya
Defendant / Appellee:
TRINITY SERVICES GROUP, INC., TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, TROUSDALE TURNER CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Nour v. Davidson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2021cv00189
Defendant:
Sgt. (f/n/u) Johnson, A. Gilbert, Davidson County Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Abdulrahman Nour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilmore v. Trinity Services Group Inc.
as 4:2020cv00136
Plaintiff:
Sean Gilmore
Defendant:
Trinity Services Group Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Spurling v. Trinity Services Group Inc.
as 4:2019cv02872
Defendant:
Trinity Services Group Inc.
Plaintiff:
Denzel Spurling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Young v. Trinity Services Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv02465
Plaintiff:
Aaron E Young
Defendant:
Brad Smith and Trinity Services Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boles #156632 v. Rogers et al
as 1:2018cv01297
Defendant:
Charles Bernard, Unknown Rogers, Joan E. Rogers and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Boles #156632, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kensu v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv10175
Plaintiff:
Temujin Kensu
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Patricia Caruso, Dan Heyns and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
