Cases 1 - 10 of 548
Lloyd v. Mackey
as 1:2024cv00622
Petitioner:
Cronie Lloyd
Respondent:
Acting Warden Misty Mackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eckstein v. Lloyd et al.
as 1:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
Andrew Eckstein
Defendant:
Inspector Diane Lloyd, Warden Jennifer Black and Lutinent D. Thrasher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Whittamore et al
as 3:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Howard Willis
Defendant:
Abigail Whittamore, Raymond Moyer, Zachary Pound and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elizalde v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv12526
Plaintiff:
Robert Elizalde
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc., Genesee County, Deputy Kristopher Pavlica and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lloyd Hammond v. James Green
as 23-5502
Petitioner / Appellant:
LLOYD HAMMOND
Respondent / Appellee:
TIM LANE, Warden, Green River Correctional Complex and JAMES DAVID GREEN, Warden, Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex
Romero Thomas v. Douglas Smith, et al
as 23-1430
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROMERO MONTE THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUGLAS SMITH, Deputy Warden, JEREMY HOWARD, Assistant Deputy Warden, MICHELLE L. PARSONS, Assistant Resident Unit Supervisor and others
Romero Thomas v. Douglas Smith, et al
as 23-1358
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROMERO MONTE THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUGLAS SMITH, Deputy Warden, JEREMY HOWARD, Assistant Deputy Warden, MICHELLE L. PARSONS, Assistant Resident Unit Supervisor and others
Whitiker v. USA
as 6:2023cv00052
Petitioner:
Lloyd S. Whitiker
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Romero Thomas v. Douglas Smith, et al
as 23-1309
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROMERO MONTE THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUGLAS SMITH, Deputy Warden, JEREMY HOWARD, Assistant Deputy Warden, MICHELLE L. PARSONS, Assistant Resident Unit Supervisor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
