Cases 91 - 100 of 150
Bragg v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2019cv00254
Plaintiff:
John Bragg
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dooley v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2019cv00237
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies, LLC and 3M Company
Plaintiff:
George Dooley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips et al v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2019cv00211
Defendant:
Aearo, LLC, Aearo Holdings, LLC, 3M Company and others
Plaintiff:
Chistopher Wade Phillips and Eric Wayne Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Heath v. 3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
as 3:2019cv00192
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies, LLC and 3M Company
Plaintiff:
Samuel Tomas Heath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lehman v. 3M Company
as 2:2019cv00564
Plaintiff:
James Lehman
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. 3M Company
as 3:2019cv00122
Plaintiff:
Bryan Davis
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
State of Ohio, ex rel, et al v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2019cv00120
Defendant:
Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, National Foam, Inc., Tyco Fire Products, LP and others
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio, ex rel. Michael Dewine Ohio Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johns et al v. Wolverine World Wide, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01302
Plaintiff:
Jeff Steendam, Megan Johns, Danielle Galloway and others
Defendant:
Wolverine World Wide, Inc., 3M Company f/k/a Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., and The 3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dykehouse et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2018cv01225
Plaintiff:
David Dykehouse, Kristina Boskovich and Elizabeth Hamblin
Defendant:
The 3M Company and Georgia-Pacific LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hardwick v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2018cv01185
Defendant:
SolvaySpecialty Polymers, USA, LLC, E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, THE CHEMOURS COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin D. Hardwick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
