Cases 91 - 100 of 3,056
Andrews et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv10897
Plaintiff:
Gerald E. Andrews, Mary Margaret Baker, John Franklin Bishop and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., AMEREX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Robinson #182351 v. Bush et al
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
James Robinson #182351
Defendant:
Jermey Bush, James Corrigan, K. Benoit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Heath v. Cole et al
as 1:2024cv10568
Plaintiff:
Mark Andrew Heath and Mark Andrew Heath [E-filer]
Defendant:
Gary Charles Cole, Jr., Adrian Anderson and Oscoda, County of
Taylor v. Gateway Pediatric Therapy, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv10770
Plaintiff:
Keyunna E. Taylor
Defendant:
Gateway Pediatric Therapy, LLC, Vicki Nguyen, Ghadir Safar and others
Engle v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 4:2024cv10461
Plaintiff:
Harold E. Engle
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Social Security, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
(Court Use Only) SSA Notification - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Turner #746944 v. Pelky et al
as 1:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Lionel E. Turner #746944
Defendant:
Unknown Pelky, Patrick Miseta, Jason Erway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Braveman v. S & E Distributor, Inc.
as 5:2024cv10959
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN S BRAVEMAN and Jonathan S. Braveman
Defendant:
S & E DISTRIBUTOR, INC. Doing business as THE ODYSSEY GROUP and Raghed Samona
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
McDowell v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv10382
Plaintiff:
Danny Eugene McDowell, Danny E. McDowell and Danny McDowell
Defendant:
Raphael Washington, Robert Dunlap and John Doe
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
