Cases 101 - 110 of 198
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Guzman v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 4:2013cv01205
Plaintiff:
Wilmer A Guzman
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America , Michael V. Pugh , Albert Aiad-Toss, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Allen et al v. Clark et al
as 1:2013cv00326
Plaintiff:
Precious Allen and Dawn Brunner
Defendant:
Jay Clark, Kasey Eaves, Sharon Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Blaine v. Louisville Metro Government et al
as 3:2013cv00427
Plaintiff:
Daniella Blaine
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Government, Steve Conrad, Tinnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00885
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Brown v. Campbell County, Kentucky et al
as 2:2013cv00054
Plaintiff:
James Michael Brown
Defendant:
Campbell County, Kentucky, Greg L. Buckler, James A. Daley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
