Cases 131 - 140 of 566
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00291
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Arthur Styles v. VA, et al
as 17-5778
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR B. STYLES
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
Jami Steeg v. Thomas Vilsack, et al
as 17-5737
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMI W. STEEG
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. VILSACK, Secretary, United States Department of Agriculture, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Louisville Kentucky and U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Davis v. United States Attorney for the Northern District of Ohio
as 1:2017cv01354
Plaintiff:
Cortez Davis
Defendant:
United States Attorney for the Northern District of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00359
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
In re: Mary M. Jame
as 17-8014
Debtor:
In re: MARY M. JAMES
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY M. JAMES
Defendant:
ACS, FIFTH THIRD BANK OF NORTHWEST OHIO, NA, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ECMC and EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
In re: Mary M. James
as 17-8014
Defendant / Appellee:
EDUCATION DEPARTMENT and ECMC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY M. JAMES
Defendant:
ACS, FIFTH THIRD BANK OF NORTHWEST OHIO, NA and OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
Debtor:
In re: MARY M. JAMES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv11322
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Carter v. United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv00248
Plaintiff:
Orlando Carter, r
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Department of Justice, United States Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
