Cases 141 - 150 of 546,644
Davis v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02719
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Davis
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Shade v. Warden Franklin County Corrections Center II
as 2:2024cv02694
Petitioner:
O'Bryan Shade
Respondent:
Warden Franklin County Corrections Center II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Daugherty v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00290
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Stanley Daugherty
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Fox et al v. Cocke County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Troy J Fox and Jeanene Fox
Defendant:
Cocke County, Tennessee, Maxwell Grayson Laughter, Town of Parrottsville and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Haga v. Lawn Care and More Inc. et al (JRG3)
as 2:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Matthew Gage Haga
Defendant:
Lawn Care and More Inc. and John C. Bushong
White v. City of Memphis, TN et al
as 2:2024cv02340
Plaintiff:
Mark White, Sr. doing business as Tokyo Nights
Defendant:
City of Memphis, TN and Paul Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. City of Brownsville et al
as 1:2024cv01108
Plaintiff:
Andrew Terrell Lee
Defendant:
City of Brownsville, Haywood County, Billy H. Garrett, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
