Cases 11 - 20 of 209
Delmi Ramirez-Ramos, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3827
Petitioner:
DELMI YULIBETH RAMIREZ-RAMOS, JIMMY ISAAC ORTIZ-RAMIREZ and JAHIR DANIEL ORTIZ-RAMIREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Cerrato et al v. City of Memphis, Tennessee et al
as 2:2023cv02602
Plaintiff:
Henry Paz Cerrato, Pedro Gomez, Edgardo Flores Sequeiros and others
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Cerelyn Davis, R. Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Victor Guzman-Ramos v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3763
Petitioner:
VICTOR GUZMAN-RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
HealthCare Facility Managment LLC v. Ramos
as 1:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
HealthCare Facility Managment LLC and HealthCare Facility Managment LLC doing business as CommuniCare Family of Companies
Counter Claimant:
Jeddalyn Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Guadalupe Ramos v. USA
as 23-5272
Petitioner / Appellant:
GUADALUPE RAMOS
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ramos v. Central Ohio Cleaning, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00514
Plaintiff:
Edwin Ramos
Defendant:
Central Ohio Cleaning Inc. and Nick Schrock
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ramos v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00520
Plaintiff:
Jessica Ramos
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
