Cases 11 - 20 of 183
Ingram v. USA
as 5:2022cv01863
Petitioner:
Anthony L. Ingram
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Smith v. O'Connell
as 3:2022cv00366
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Smith
Defendant:
Mike O'Connell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cook v. Garza
as 4:2022cv01064
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Cook
Defendant:
Warden F. Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Anthony Viola v. Dave Yost, et al
as 22-3262
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY L. VIOLA
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVE YOST, Ohio Attorney General, DANIEL KASARIS, Assistant Ohio Attorney General and DAMIAN A. BILLAK
Hart v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
as 1:2022cv00162
Petitioner:
Anthony L Hart
Respondent:
Warden Ronald Erdos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anthony Cook v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 22-3065
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY L. COOK
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, M.D., Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons. and MARK WILLIAMS, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Elkton
Hart v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
as 1:2022cv00023
Petitioner:
Anthony L Hart
Respondent:
Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony Jones v. Chae Harris
as 21-4180
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY L. JONES
Respondent / Appellee:
JAY FORSHEY, Warden and CHAE HARRIS, Warden
Anthony Viola v. Cuyahoga Co Land Reutilization, et al
as 21-4139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY L. VIOLA
Defendant / Appellee:
CUYAHOGA COUNTY LAND REUTILIZATION CORPORATION, fka Cuyahoga County Land Bank, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cook v. Shaffer
as 4:2021cv01549
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Cook
Defendant:
G Shaffer and G. Shaffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
