Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Smith-Hodges v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2015cv02811
Plaintiff:
Cedric Smith-Hodges
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Shelby County Sheriff's Office, City of Memphis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Nine Thousand, Nine Hundred and Eighty Dollars in U.S. Currency ($9,980.00), (CATS No. 15-ATF-010657)
as 3:2015cv02523
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Nine Thousand, Nine Hundred and Eighty Dollars in U.S. Currency ($9,980.00), (CATS No. 15-ATF-010657)
Claimant:
Janika McKinney
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841
United States of America et al v. Nine Thousand, Nine Hundred and Eighty Dollars in U.S. Currency ($9,980.00), (CATS No. 15-ATF-010657)
as 3:2015mc00060
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Nine Thousand, Nine Hundred and Eighty Dollars in U.S. Currency ($9,980.00), (CATS No. 15-ATF-010657)
Claimant:
Janika McKinney
James Smith v. Robert Farley, et al
as 15-5189
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES PRESTON SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT L. FARLEY, Warden, TIM FAZENBAKER, Unit Manager, Big Sandy, FEDERAL P.O. OFFICER, Beckley, WV and others
Smith v. Farley et al
as 7:2014cv00102
Petitioner:
James Preston Smith
Respondent:
Robert L. Farley, T. Fazenbaker, Fed. P.O. Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hill v. Cuyahoga County et al
as 1:2011cv00874
Plaintiff:
David Tyrone Hill
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County, Kenneth Kochevar, Director of Cuyahoga County Corrections Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hordo et al v. Glover et al
as 1:2010cv02593
Plaintiff:
Amun Hordo and Mario Herring
Defendant:
Detective Glover, ATF Agent Hall and Officer Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CJ Enterprises, Incorporated v. ATF Trucking, LLC
as 2:2007cv14312
Plaintiff:
CJ Enterprises, Incorporated
Defendant:
ATF Trucking, LLC
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
