Cases 11 - 20 of 5,631
Yatinkumar Patel, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3323
Petitioner:
YATINKUMAR TRIBHOVANDAS PATEL, MITTAL YATINKUMAR PATEL and AARAV YATINBHAI PATEL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Oakland Family Restaurants, Inc., et al v. American Dairy Queen Corporation
as 24-1331
Plaintiff:
OAKLAND FAMILY RESTAURANTS, INC. and LAKE AREA RESTAURANTS, INC.
Defendant:
AMERICAN DAIRY QUEEN CORP.
Intervenor:
MICHIGAN ATTORNEY GENERAL
Henry v. Fitz
as 2:2024cv02242
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Petitioner:
Scotty Wayne Henry
Respondent:
Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crawford et al v. McKinley et al
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L. Crawford, Jonah Gabriel JahJah T. Tishbite, Alton Chisolm and others
Defendant:
Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr., The United States Congress, The United States Senate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Papa Diop v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3312
Petitioner:
PAPA CHEIKHOU DIOP
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Kevin Giles v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-1320
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LA'VON GILES
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General, DAWN N. ISON, DIANE NICOLE PRINC and others
Jesus Zarate v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3307
Petitioner:
JESUS IGNACIO ZARATE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Gurkaran Singh v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3302
Petitioner:
GURKARAN SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Mohammed Hussain, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3295
Petitioner:
MOHAMMED ALI HUSSAIN, RABIYA KHANOM WAHIDA and TASNIM JANNAT HUSSAIN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
