Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Baughman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03996
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mary Baughman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01139
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Leftwich et al v. Driscoll et al
as 2:2020cv10881
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Dan Leftwich and Lisa Leftwich
Defendant:
Team Leader Steven McInchak, John Doe, Rockwood, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baughman v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 1:2019cv00545
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Takeda Development Center Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Linda Baughman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baughman v. Michelin North American, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00781
Defendant:
Michelin North American, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nicholas W. Baughman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baughman et al v. KTH Parts Industries, Inc et al
as 3:2019cv00008
Plaintiff:
Candi Williams, Justin Baughman and Shawn Nichols
Defendant:
KTH Parts Leesburg Products, LLC and KTH Parts Industries, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Baughman v. The General Electric Company et al
as 1:2016cv01508
Defendant:
General Electric Company and Xiaoni Wang
Plaintiff:
Amy Baughman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cohen et al v Jaffe Raitt Heuer & Weiss, P.C., et al
as 2:2016cv11484
Plaintiff:
Neal Cohen , Darren Chaffee and SSL Assets, LLC
Defendant:
Jaffe Raitt Heuer and Weiss, P. C. , Jeffrey Michael Weiss , Lee Kellert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lytle v. Scott et al
as 2:2015cv03117
Defendant:
Zach Scott, Abib Mohamed, Phillip Harrow and others
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Lytle, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
