Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Owens #829102 v. Briske et al
as 1:2022cv00443
Defendant:
Candi Mason, Unknown Dankfert, Addie Briske and others
Plaintiff:
D'Angelo Jarmal Owens #829102
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Powell v. MDOC, et al
as 22-1361
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL LEON POWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BRIAN MAJERCYZK, Oaks Mental Health Chief, ROBERTA MARSHALL, Psychologist and others
Tolbert #609600 v. Crompton et al
as 1:2022cv00371
Plaintiff:
Gary Tolbert #609600
Defendant:
Robert M. Crompton, Scott Weaver, Nicki Monroe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Margosian #799744 v. Martinson et al
as 1:2021cv01061
Plaintiff:
Christian Margosian #799744
Defendant:
Unknown Martinson, Unknown Sheppard, Robert Crompton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnny Tippins v. Les Parish, et al
as 21-2949
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNNY TIPPINS
Defendant / Appellee:
LES PARISH, Warden, T. BASSETT, Grievance Coordinator, J. SPENCLEY, Assistant Deputy Warden and others
Bellinger v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01287
Plaintiff:
Bellinger Gabriel and Gabriel Bellinger
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bock #520205 v. Michigan Department of Corrections Health Service Operations et al
as 1:2021cv00175
Defendant:
N. Monroe, Unknown Danker, Michigan Department of Corrections Health Service Operations and others
Plaintiff:
Chad Bock #520205
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas Jackson v. Berean, et al
as 20-1296
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS CORNELL JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DIRECTOR OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, DEPUTY WARDEN THOMAS, PRISON GUARD M. BROWN and others
Sawaya #253139 v. Briske et al
as 1:2020cv00220
Plaintiff:
John J. Sawaya #253139
Defendant:
Addie Briske, Jack Bellinger, Robert Crompton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
