Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Colley v. Proctor & Gamble Co. et al
as 1:2016cv00918
Plaintiff:
Rodney Colley , Doe 10 John , Matthew Farber and others
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Co. and John Does 1-10
Receiver:
Matthew Craige
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Colley v. Proctor & Gamble Co. et al
as 2:2016cv00225
Plaintiff:
Rodney Colley , Doe 10 John , Matthew Farber and others
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Co. and John Does 1-10
Receiver:
Matthew Craige
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carter v. Vandikan et al
as 2:2014cv02342
Plaintiff:
Anna M. Vines Carter
Defendant:
Scott Vandikan, Tacky, Slar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carter v. OSU Harding Hospital et al
as 2:2014cv02345
Plaintiff:
Anna M. Vines Carter
Defendant:
OSU Harding Hospital, Slanders, Cunnham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carter v. Clerk of Court of Columbus Franklin et al
as 2:2014cv02344
Plaintiff:
Anna M. Vines Carter
Defendant:
Clerk of Court of Columbus Franklin, Wealthy History, Doctor West and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carter v. Grant Hospital et al
as 2:2014cv02343
Plaintiff:
Anna M. Vines Carter
Defendant:
Grant Hospital, Sander, Slader and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cota v. Cook et al
as 2:2011cv13280
Plaintiff:
McKinnon Cota
Defendant:
Donald R. Cook, Michigan, State of , Wayne, County of and others
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Centerfold, Incorporated et al
as 2:2009cv13855
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., EMI Virgin Songs, Inc., End of Music, LLC and others
Defendant:
Centerfold, Incorporated and Michael Manolakas
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Type:
Other Statutes
McKinnon #223186 v. Rapelje
as 1:2009cv00644
Petitioner:
Cota McKinnon #223186
Respondent:
Lloyd Rapelje
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Francis Cota v. Linda Metrich
as 08-1873
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANCIS DONALD COTA
Respondent - Appellee:
LINDA METRISH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
