Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Anderson v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 1:2016cv00139
Plaintiff:
Calvin E Anderson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United States of America v. Anderson et al
as 5:2016cv00329
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Scott E Anderson, Andrea L Anderson, Summa Health System and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Anderson v. Schofield
as 3:2015cv00899
Plaintiff:
Dwayne E. Anderson
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Ruth Slone v. 1st National Cash Refund, Inc., et al
as 14-3581
Debtor:
In re: JASON E. ANDERSON and ERICA L. ANDERSON
Appellee:
RUTH A. SLONE
Appellant:
1ST NATIONAL CASH REFUND, INC. and CARL H. WOODFORD
Ernest M. Anderson, Jr. v. Gary Cook, et al
as 14-3525
Plaintiff - Appellant:
E. ANDERSON-EL
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY G. COOK, JULIA BATES, CHRISTOPHER ANDERSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3365
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Anderson v. Cook et al
as 3:2014cv00422
Plaintiff:
E. Anderson-El
Defendant:
Gary G. Cook, Julia Bates, Christopher Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. CIGNA Group Insurance, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv01137
Plaintiff:
Kim E. Anderson
Defendant:
CIGNA Group Insurance, Inc. and Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
In re: Jason Anderson, et al
as 13-8047
Debtor:
In re: JASON E. ANDERSON and ERICA L. ANDERSON
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RUTH A. SLONE
Defendant - Appellant:
1ST NATIONAL CASH REFUND, INC. and CARL H. WOODFORD
Defendant:
JASON E. ANDERSON and ERICA L. ANDERSON
Anderson v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 1:2013cv02074
Plaintiff:
James E. Anderson, Jr.
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Attorney, N.D. Ohio and City of Cleveland, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
