Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Meeker v. Grant County Detention Center et al
as 2:2020cv00042
Defendant:
Grant County Detention Center, Mike Webster, J. Hale and others
Plaintiff:
David W. Meeker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Hale
as 4:2019cv00169
Defendant:
Jennifer J. Hale
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. et al v. Hale et al
as 4:2018cv02388
Defendant:
Ronald E. Hale and Joetta J. Hale
Plaintiff:
CHK Utica, L.L.C., Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C., Chesapeake Operating, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185
Lawrence v. United States District Court et al
as 3:2016cv00131
Plaintiff:
Marcus J. Lawrence, SR
Defendant:
United States District Court, Greg N. Stivers, Thomas B. Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. v. Henceroth et al
as 4:2016cv00150
Plaintiff:
Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Dale H. Henceroth, Melinda J. Henceroth, Ronald E. Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Gripp v. Hale
as 3:2016cv00022
Plaintiff:
David M. Gripp
Defendant:
David J. Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00381
Plaintiff:
Gail J. Hale
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pitt v. Health and Human Services et al
as 1:2014cv00102
Plaintiff:
Judy Pitt
Defendant:
Health and Human Services, Commissioner of Social Security and David J. Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Schonberg v. McConnell et al
as 3:2013cv00220
Plaintiff:
Steve Schonberg
Defendant:
Mitch McConnell, Joseph R. Biden, Terrance W. Gainer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
