Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Nemes et al v. Bensinger et al
as 3:2020cv00407
Defendant:
Sarah Rogers, Marilyn Dishman, Jack Snograss and others
Plaintiff:
Ken Kearns, Erik Hermes, James "Rich" Howland and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Keisha Dorsey
Intervenor:
Amy McGrath for Senate, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anderson et al v. SNYDER et al
as 5:2020cv10171
Plaintiff:
Verlesa Berry, Keyanna Tims, J. B. and others
Defendant:
Bradley Wurfel, Michael Glasgow, Michael Prysby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mercedes Benz USA LLC v. Lewis
as 2:2019cv10948
Plaintiff:
Mercedes Benz USA LLC
Defendant:
James Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Harden v. Wayne et al
as 2:2017cv11039
Plaintiff:
Darryl Harden
Defendant:
County of Wayne , Michael Gatson, Michael Sebastian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis et al v. Marshall et al
as 2:2016cv11773
Plaintiff:
James Lewis and Marcin Lewis
Defendant:
Doris Marshall, Roland Lewis and Thrift Savings Plan
Oakley et al v. The Citizens Bank of Logan, Ohio et al
as 2:2015cv01263
Plaintiff:
Jack V. Oakley and Saranne Oakley
Defendant:
The Citizens Bank of Logan, Ohio, Citizens Independent Bancorp, Inc., Bryan K. Starner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Norton v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00058
Plaintiff:
James Lewis Norton
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frye v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv00918
Plaintiff:
James Lewis Frye
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv02169
Plaintiff:
James Lewis
Defendant:
Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armour et al v. Pilgrim's Pride Corp.
as 1:2011cv00367
Plaintiff:
Aireal Armour and James Lewis
Defendant:
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
